What is the legal term for the process of removing a juror from a case?

The legal term for the process of removing a juror from a case is often referred to as a peremptory challenge. This term describes a specific type of challenge that allows either party in a trial to dismiss a certain number of jurors without stating a reason. It serves to enable attorneys to shape the jury's composition based on their strategic considerations about how particular jurors may influence the trial's outcome.

In the context of jury selection, peremptory challenges are utilized alongside another type of challenge, known as a challenge for cause, which does require a valid reason for dismissal, such as bias or a conflict of interest. However, peremptory challenges are distinctive in their flexibility, allowing for the removal of jurors based on intuition or instinct rather than on a specific cause.

Other options present different concepts related to jury procedures. For instance, voir dire refers to the process where potential jurors are questioned to assess their suitability for serving on a jury, while jury nullification involves the jury's decision to acquit a defendant, even if the evidence suggests they may be guilty, based on the jury's belief that the law itself is unjust. These terms, while related to the overall jury process, do not specifically denote the act of removing a jur